Al-Aqsa incitement from the mufti to Ali Abunimah

It’s a perennial hit: Haj Amin al Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, who later gained notoriety as a Nazi collaborator, did it already in the 1920s; senior Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti did it in 2000; and now Ali Abunimah is doing his bit to keep the tradition of spurious claims about Jewish threats to Al-Aqsa alive.

On his Electronic Intifada blog, Abunimah has a post announcing that Likud leaders plan to go to Al-Aqsa, that they are calling for “cleansing” Jerusalem and building a Jewish temple instead of the mosque. At the bottom of the post there is an update that sort of acknowledges that there is no basis to the story, but unsurprisingly, this doesn’t prevent Abunimah from concluding:

There’s certainly no doubt that whoever published this flyer – which was taken as real by the Israeli media – is tapping into a history of calls and growing support for destroying Al-Aqsa. Feiglin’s supporters too are clear about their desire to take over the Temple Mount.

When I looked at the post, it had just over 100 tweets and some 150 Facebook endorsements. Hitler’s mufti would have loved such an efficient way to spread his incitement.

Here are some screenshots documenting the spread of Abunimah’s tale in the Twittersphere (click to enlarge):

As Abunimah knows full well, since 1967, Israel has treated the Temple Mount very differently from how the Jordanians treated Jewish holy sites before 1967. Here is a short summary:

Today, an Islamic Waqf, or religious committee, manages the Temple Mount, though Israel provides security and upholds decisions made by the waqf about access to the site.

For Jews, visiting the Temple Mount is a very controversial subject- both in terms of religious allowance and because non-Muslim prayer is prohibited at the site. Although freedom of access to the site is enshrined as law, Israel does not allow non-Muslim prayer on the Mount so as not to offend Muslim worshippers. Beyond this, many rabbi’s say that since the Jewish Temple’s Holy of Holies stood near the center of today’s Temple Mount, Jews are religiously forbidden from entering the area.

Arabs can enter the Temple Mount through one of ten different Muslim-only gates from various sites in the Old City. Tourists and Jews are only allowed access to the site through the Mugrabi Gate which is located just above to the left of the Kotel, or Western Wall plaza.

I outlined the tradition of incitement that Abunimah is now so eagerly adopting on my Jerusalem Post blog in October 2009; the (currently inaccessible) post is reproduced below, with some of the links that are no longer functional in […]. Additional examples of this “tradition” can also be found here.

80 years of Al-Aqsa incitement

It’s not about the “occupation” – the call to “defend” the Al-Aqsa mosque against imaginary Jewish onslaughts has been used with often deadly consequences since the 1920s.

* * *

In Israel, the news that President Obama was awarded this year’s Nobel Peace Prize came together with news of renewed violence in Jerusalem. It’s unlikely that the Nobel laureate will be briefed about the recent riots in Jerusalem – after all, among the world’s many violent conflicts that require the president’s attention, the incidents in Jerusalem are hardly more than minor disturbances. But it’s a great pity that Obama will probably not be informed about the recent violence in Jerusalem, because these events tell the story of the Middle East conflict in a nutshell and illustrate why peace has proven so elusive.

Some of the crucial points have been highlighted in an excellent commentary by Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper that was published last week in the Jerusalem Post.  Hier and Cooper rightly contrast the easy accessibility of the Western Wall – which can be visited by anyone – with the restrictions imposed on visits to the Temple Mount, where non-Muslims have access only at strictly limited hours and are prohibited from praying or performing any religious rituals.

However, not for the first time, recent events have shown that observing all these restrictions still doesn’t guarantee that visitors will not be pelted with stones by Palestinian Muslims who see themselves as heroic “defenders” of the Al-Aqsa mosque – which is threatened only in their fevered imagination.

It’s safe to assume that those stone-throwing youngsters have never asked themselves how come that the “occupied” Temple Mount is under the authority of the Muslim Waqf authorities. If they had ever asked this question, they would find out that in 1967, when Israel gained control of the area, Israel acknowledged the authority of the Waqf over the Temple Mount as an immediate gesture of goodwill – which came after almost 20 years of Jordanian control of the area, when Jews had been prevented from coming to the Western Wall in breach of the armistice agreement, and when Jewish property, places of worship and cemeteries had been systematically destroyed and desecrated.

The idea that the Al-Aqsa mosque is threatened by Jews is an invention that goes back to the days of Haj Amin al Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, who later gained notoriety as a Nazi collaborator. In the 1920s, al Husseini renovated the “Haram al-Sharif” – as the Temple Mount is known in Arabic – and he began to accuse “the Zionists” of plotting to rebuild the Jewish Temple. His incitement contributed to repeated outbreaks of violence against Jews that culminated in the Hebron massacre of 1929.

Some 80 years later, al Husseini’s legacy is echoed in the incitement spread by the likes of   Sheikh Raed Salah, the head of the Islamic Movement’s northern branch, and Sheikh Kamal Khatib, another leading figure of this group.

Both of these Islamic leaders have made statements and speeches that mix fervent Muslim piety, fanatic nationalism, antisemitism and racism. While Salah doesn’t give interviews to Jewish reporters, Khatib declared in a recent interview on Israeli radio that Jews have no historical connection to the Temple Mount and that Muslim sensibilities were offended by the presence of Jewish security guards “from Ethiopia” – whom he referred to with a racist slur against blacks. For good measure, some Islamic Movement followers shouted during a recent demonstration the triumphalist Muslim slogan often used in attacks against Jews: “Khaybar Khaybar ya Yahud, jish Muhammad saya’oud” – that is: “Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jews, Mohammed’s army will return”. [http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1119789.html]

What is rather depressing is the fact that no Palestinian or Arab leader would denounce these kind of offensive statements, the baseless accusations and the completely undignified denial of the historical and spiritual Jewish connection to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. Quite the contrary: even the famously “moderate” Palestinian prime minister Salaam Fayyad thought that the incitement was a good opportunity to rail against Israel, and Israeli Arab Knesset members happily joined in.

Western news reports on these events largely follow the “balance recipe” that reflects the assumption that if there is Palestinian violence, there must be a legitimate grievance. What Western audiences never get to see is how on these occasions even the most outlandish fabrications are used to incite Muslim fervor. Here are a few of the absurdities offered on the website “Islamonline”, which published an “interview” with “Sheikh Ali Abu-Sheikha, one of the 200 Palestinians besieged inside Al-Aqsa Mosque”. According to the Sheikh’s fevered imagination, this is what happened: [http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1254573453665&pagename=Zone-English-Muslim_Affairs/MAELayout]

“The Israeli occupation authority has mobilized thousands of settlers and extremist Jews during Sukkot to perform their rituals inside the holy Al-Aqsa itself. Backed and protected by the Israeli police, settlers have come up with drums and trumpets to perform their rituals inside Al-Aqsa. Brazenly challenging the Muslim and Arab world, Jews have announced their intention to storm Al-Aqsa. … The Israeli police has installed barriers on roads leading to Al-Aqsa. This all aimed at facilitating the situation for Jews to storm the mosque. … All Israeli provocations indicate a plan to accelerate the building of the so-called Jewish Temple … on the ruins of Al-Aqsa. According to the declaration of Israel’s Minister of Interior, there is a suggestion to divide Al-Aqsa between Muslims and Jews. Consequently, Israel tries to carry out such plan during these days.”

No doubt Haj Amin al Husseini would have liked this story – it’s just the kind of incitement he started some eighty years ago, when there was no “Israeli occupation authority” … Maybe the Nobel Prize will help Obama to find a way to bring peace to a region where religious leaders have been coming up with fabrications like this for many decades, and where even today, absurdities like this are eagerly believed by many and seized by “moderates” to advance their political agenda.

11 responses to “Al-Aqsa incitement from the mufti to Ali Abunimah

  1. I love how he implies that it’s ‘Israelis’ who call it the Temple Mount, as if Al-Aqsa as there first. Gotta love his ability to BS both past and present events; it seems to be a common tactic among his circle of ‘activists’.

  2. Pingback: A new Blood Libel? The "storming" of the Temple Mount - ScrollPost.com

  3. Pingback: Tweeting the century-old Al-Aqsa libel | The Warped Mirror

  4. There is an unfortunate predilection on the part of muslims like Abunimah towards believing that all are against them. That paranoia comes straight from the teachings of mo who warned them against trusting anyone but fellow muslims and this added to the oversized sense of their own worth which has no basis in reality. It translates onto their relationships with fellow muslims too. Being inclined towards paranoia as was their prophet they are all too ready to believe that their allies will betray them, as their prophet betrayed his allies.

    Such lack of reflective function is encultured but also phobic – they dare not think about the consequences of their actions (even assuming that they are aware of cause and effect) because it might transpire that they are wrong about this or that, and if that’s the case, what else might they be wrong about? Far better not to reflect at all – better to react and act out.

    They are also phobic about being shamed (which is why we should do it as often as we can) and therefore dare not admit when they themselves are in the wrong, preferring rather to project blame for the consequences of their being wrong onto others, ie onto Jews/Israel or anyone else but themselves.

    Abunimah may well believe all the nonsense he spouts, but something tells me that he is also resorting to it in order to parade his “muslim-ness” so as to prove something to his audience, in much the same way as the North Koreans gave way to overblown public excesses of “grief” for their latest departed leader. All that shows is Abunimah’s insecurity and, as I have said, we should exacerbate that whenever and wherever we can.

    • Babs, I’m somewhat uncomfortable with talking about “muslims” in general, since I would think of muslims first and foremonst as individuals. However, this may be purely a semantic matter, since I definitely think societies have distinct characteristics; but I tend to attribute the issues you raise here more to Islam as interpreted and practiced by mainstream Muslim societies/groups today — keeping in mind that they have choices, i.e. there could be an Islamic “reformation” if there was social demand/pressure for it, or if Muslim authorities were pushing for it —- which obviously isn’t the case.

      So in my view, many of the issues you’re raising here have a lot to do with the fact that Islam has become an ossified dogmatic belief system that insists on its relevance not only for the spiritual lives of its followers, but also for all social and political aspects of Muslims and their societies & states. On top of it, mainstream Islam nowadays often seems turned to the past by holding out the promise of resurrecting an imaginary glorious past — creating lots of misery in the present.

      Another point is that I’m not sure if thinking about “muslims like Abunimah” gets us anywhere. As far as I know his output, he usually expresses any Muslim identification only when it suits him to bash others for being “Islamophobic.” One of the most ridiculous examples I remember was some outbursts of his around Christmas time, when he tweeted something about Obama eating pork as some sort of anti-Muslim gesture…

      Also, at least publicly, Abunimah (or Ben White, e.g.) are actually completely one-dimensional, i.e. they exist only due to their anti-Israel agitation — and while their respective religious backgrounds may play a part in this, I think there is ample evidence to conclude that it’s primarily their obsession with the world’s only Jewish state that drives them — and what drives that obsession seems abundantly clear…

  5. Pingback: Now Twitter helps fuel hateful Arab incitement - ScrollPost.com

  6. Pingback: Now Twitter helps fuel hateful Arab incitement | ISRAEL TRIBUNE

  7. Pingback: Liar Liar, Mosque On Fire : Israellycool

  8. Pingback: Liar Liar, Mosque On Fire | Jumping the Zionist Shark

  9. Pingback: Het gerucht gáát weer! De Joden ontheiligen de moskee! Mars op Jeruzalem! | AmsterdamPost

  10. Pingback: BBC’s Knell showcases Electronic Intifada | BBC Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s